Paper: A Discussion on the Legalization og Assisted Suicide

I.V.-positive, but had no symptoms and may not develop them for years, was helped to die. Probably the doctors didn't explain that even if he had a terminal disease he could enjoy the rest of his life with his family and friend that were about to lose him. Doctors aren't trained to do this in medical school and the public doesn't know better. This is because doctors aren’ t trained properly in the relief of pain and discomfort in terminally ill patients. And time should be devoted in medical schools to explain to the future doctors that there are going to be some patients that they are not going to be able to save but must address their needs. Also the public hasn't been properly educated about the choices they have at the end of their life. The purpose of this work is to create a national commission that would study the care of the terminally ill giving treatment to the dying patients. Both people who support and oppose euthanasia will be able to participate having in mind that the real problem is the care for the terminally ill. This will help the people to make up their minds and arrive at a consensus. This work was written for a neutral but mature audience. This work was printed in the New York Times and deals with an important issue that some people may not understand. The language of the work is not confusing. The issue seen in the argument is complicated and may not be suitable for everybody. People must understand the problem before judging on it. This work has a proposal argument since it talks about making a commission to deal with the legalization problem of euthanasia and assisted suicide. This commission would be in charge of finding solutions for the problem of the care of terminally ill patients and not the legalization of assisted suicides or euthanasia. This commission would help people understand the problem the legalization of euthanasia would bring to our nation....